Great post! This is pretty relevant to my org's current predicament.
Last year, we found ourselves doing a lot of things and our goals weren't pointed enough. We recently switched to an OKR model for our weekly reviews and now there's a sense of direction. The biggest change I've witnessed is through constant (weekly) reiteration of our "goal", all our departments are aligned in terms of the company mission.
In my teams and in my side gig as a team coach i use several formats to align disoriented teams:
- first i train them to talk in non violent communication while providing mgmt insight depth
- then i run a format i call a team retrospective to dig for the core issues and, at the same time, rebuild empathy
- and then we run a team realignment workshop based on the team canvas (teamcanvas.com + some own points), which ideally every new team runs as a kick off.
The goal is to create explicit clarity across the three conflict categories:
- Task: what are we doing and why?
- Process: how are we achieve it in the most efficient way?
- Relationship: how can we maintain empathy and true collaboration?
In disoriented teams usually one ore more category is off or the communication skill is missing. Sometimes they also assume they are aligned but it is not explicit enough (assuming vs knowing)
The key to all is creating explicit alignment. Ideally, you just start with the team kick off without it getting disoriented And staying aligned through regular checkins and course adjustments - across all three categories. In my teams we do it through a key points canvas in sprint retros, through check in questions in stand ups and mid point check ins when half way between milestones. Enough time to reflect on what has happened and enough time to being motivated to change it.
Oh, and it all builds on psychological safety. People need to feel safe to provide quality feedback and insights. —> googles number 1 success driver for high performance teams :)
great question! and longer response coming, but in short strategy is the best solution here: it keeps teams aligned, it keeps charters tight, and it makes it clear where to make trade-offs
I’ll share a future post about systems that leverage strategy to prevent disorientation
Great post! This is pretty relevant to my org's current predicament.
Last year, we found ourselves doing a lot of things and our goals weren't pointed enough. We recently switched to an OKR model for our weekly reviews and now there's a sense of direction. The biggest change I've witnessed is through constant (weekly) reiteration of our "goal", all our departments are aligned in terms of the company mission.
some thoughts on implementing OKRs https://runthebusiness.substack.com/p/okr-myths
In my teams and in my side gig as a team coach i use several formats to align disoriented teams:
- first i train them to talk in non violent communication while providing mgmt insight depth
- then i run a format i call a team retrospective to dig for the core issues and, at the same time, rebuild empathy
- and then we run a team realignment workshop based on the team canvas (teamcanvas.com + some own points), which ideally every new team runs as a kick off.
The goal is to create explicit clarity across the three conflict categories:
- Task: what are we doing and why?
- Process: how are we achieve it in the most efficient way?
- Relationship: how can we maintain empathy and true collaboration?
In disoriented teams usually one ore more category is off or the communication skill is missing. Sometimes they also assume they are aligned but it is not explicit enough (assuming vs knowing)
The key to all is creating explicit alignment. Ideally, you just start with the team kick off without it getting disoriented And staying aligned through regular checkins and course adjustments - across all three categories. In my teams we do it through a key points canvas in sprint retros, through check in questions in stand ups and mid point check ins when half way between milestones. Enough time to reflect on what has happened and enough time to being motivated to change it.
Oh, and it all builds on psychological safety. People need to feel safe to provide quality feedback and insights. —> googles number 1 success driver for high performance teams :)
great question! and longer response coming, but in short strategy is the best solution here: it keeps teams aligned, it keeps charters tight, and it makes it clear where to make trade-offs
I’ll share a future post about systems that leverage strategy to prevent disorientation
longer response: https://runthebusiness.substack.com/p/staying-synced-on-strategy